ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID pneumonia can lead to pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax during non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation. This affects the prognosis. Methodology: During the study period, 121 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections and invasive or non-invasive ventilation therapy were recorded in our hospital. All patients with a pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum were analyzed in more detail. Result(s): Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum occurred in 12 patients and resulted in 7 deaths. Discussion(s): The incidence of pneumothorax with COVID infection ranges from 0.56 to 1%, reaching 3.5% in our own studies and 4.2% under invasive mechanical ventilation. The incidence of pneumomediastinum was 10% and 9.2% in our own patients. Overall mortality was 58.3% and similar to that reported in the literature, up to 60%.Copyright © 2023 Dustri-Verlag Dr. K. Feistle.
ABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus in 2019 was recognized as one of the leading causes of death worldwide. According to reports, the mortality rate in people who need mechanical ventilation varies from 50 to 97 percent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of Covid-19 disease based on different characteristics in patients and mechanically ventilated variables. Method(s): This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on 160 patients with a definite diagnosis of Covid-19 who were under mechanical ventilation and admitted to the intensive care unit of Alzahra Hospital in Isfahan from March 2020 to March 2021. Data was collected by checklist. The checklist included demographic information, including age, gender, as well as information such as underlying diseases, disease outcome, length of hospitalization, etc. After collecting the data, they were analyzed in SPSS software version 22 and at a significance level of less than 0.05. Result(s): In this study, the overall mortality rate among mechanically ventilated patients was 62.5%. The mean age of patients was 69.99+/-17.87 years and the mean duration of hospitalization in surviving patients was 15.47+/-11.73 days and for deceased ones was 55.21+/-69.14 days. The mean age of the deceased group (65.71+/-16.59) was significantly higher than the surviving group 53+/-21.17 was (P=0.0001). The length of hospital stay in the deceased group was significantly longer than the surviving group (P=0.005). As a result, ventilator mode and inotropic agent intake during treatment increased the chance of mortality in patients under mechanical ventilation (P=0.001). There was a significant relationship between underlying diseases of hypertension, kidney disease and autoimmune disease with mortality in patients (P<0.05). Conclusion(s): Various factors including the length of stay in the hospital, comorbidities such as hypertension, renal disease and autoimmunity may affect the outcome of critically ill ICU patients under mechanical ventilation. Patients who require long-term invasive ventilation and the use of inotropic drugs to maintain their cardiovascular status while hospitalized in the ICU are at higher risk for mortality.Copyright © 2022 Shetabi et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: In patients with severe respiratory failure, invasive ventilation may deteriorate the pneumomediastinum and hypoxia. This study aimed to compare the mortality and the complications of the patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related severe ARDS treated with invasive ventilation or veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) to avoid intubation. We hypothesized that VV-ECMO support without prior intubation is a feasible alternative strategy to invasive ventilation. Method(s): This retrospective study evaluated patients with COVID-19 related severe respiratory failure and radiological evidence of pneumomediastinum. The primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) survival at 90 days. Result(s): Out of 347 patients with COVID-19 disease treated in our unit, 22 patients developed spontaneous pneumomediastinum associated with deterioration of respiratory function. In 13 patients (59%), invasive ventilation was chosen as initial respiratory support;in 9 patients (41%), VV-ECMO was chosen as initial respiratory support. The median age of the patients in the invasive ventilation group was 62 years (IQR: 49-69) compared to 53 years (IQR: 46-62) in ECMO group (P=0.31). No statistically significant difference in SAPS II score between the groups was observed (39.7 (IQR: 33.2-45.3) vs. 28.9 (IQR:28.4-34.6), P=0.06). No elevated fluid balance within the first 4 days was observed in the ECMO group compared to the invasive ventilation group (162 mL (IQR: -366-2000) vs. 3905 mL (IQR: 2068-6192), P=0.07). VV-ECMO as the initial strategy for supporting patients with severe respiratory failure and pneumomediastinum, was associated with lower 90 days mortality (HR: 0.33 95%-CI: 0.11-0.97, P= 0.04) compared to patients treated with invasive ventilation (Figure). Conclusion(s): VV-ECMO can be an alternative strategy to invasive ventilation for treating patients with severe respiratory failure and spontaneous pneumomediastinum. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: The pandemic of COVID-19 since its beginning has created havoc all-round the globe. The role of oxygen therapy remains constant. Various modalities have been studied for oxygen delivery to hypoxic patients but high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has lately gained importance in terms of non-invasive oxygen delivery, easy administration and great improvement in patient's recovery. We conducted this retrospective analysis with the primary objective of looking for the proportion of patients who were successfully weaned off of HFNO or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and the secondary aim was to look for duration of hospital stay and its effect on clinical recovery based on laboratory parameters. Methods: All patients, positive for COVID-19 infection by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) were admitted to covid ICU or ward with oxygen requirement and were treated with either NIV or HFNO were enrolled for the study. Patients were grouped under H group (HFNO) or N group (NIV). Daily ABG readings, chest x-ray, respiratory rate, hemodynamic parameters and urine output were noted on 12 hourly intervals. Any changes in above parameters along with need for intubation were assessed. Results: Patients from both the groups showed significant improvement in their oxygen saturation by the fifth day of their treatment. Fourteen patients from the NIV group and 10 from the HFNO group had saturation >90% by Day 5. Of those who presented with saturation of <85%, 2 out of 5 in the NIV group (40%) and 1 of the 2 patients in the HFNO group (50%) showed improvement in their oxygen saturation. The P/F was statistically comparable (p 0.928) in both groups. The levels of bio markers, and the improvement was comparable and correlated with clinical improvement as well. Conclusion: We conclude that though HFNO is accepted better than NIV, the improvement in the respiratory status of the patient was comparable with both the treatment modalities and hence we do not recommend use of HFNO, especially in a situation of gross deficit of oxygen availability as compared to the exponential rise in the demand. © 2023 Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
ABSTRACT
Background: The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant demand for beds capable of delivering enhanced respiratory support. NHS England recommended the use of CPAP for patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure, a treatment which can be offered outside of a critical care facility, and on a Respiratory High Care/ Support Unit (RSU). The enhancement of Portsmouth's RSU provided CPAP and NIV for patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure. With our intensive care facilities at 300% their normal capacity, this greatly alleviated bed pressures on critical care. Varied levels of deprivation exist in Portsmouth's dense population. Deprivation has an impact on overall health, however the effect of postcode on outcomes for people going onto support for COVID-19 respiratory failure, is unknown. Method(s): Retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients admitted to Respiratory Support Unit during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, from 02/11/2020 to 31/01/2021. 227 patients were included in the study with 8 removed due to incomplete data, all of the patients received respiratory support in the form of CPAP or NIV. We collected multivariate data including biochemical markers, demographics, oxygenation status, co-morbidities and outcomes. Outcomes measured were: 1) Death in RSU, 2) Discharge from RSU or 3) Intubation and Ventilation. To measure deprivation, we linked a persons postcode to an area called an LSOA (Lower-layer Super Output Area). These are small areas of similar population size, each of which has a deprivation score (ie. top 10%, to the lowest 10% areas of deprivation in the UK). This is measured using an 'index of multiple deprivation'. An individual's outcome from the RSU was then analysed in relation to the deprivation score allocated to their postcode. Result(s): We observed a significant number of patients discharged from RSU, without needing invasive mechanical ventilation. 80/219 were discharged directly. 45/219 died in RSU, and 94 were eventually admitted to ITU. The average stay on CPAP or NIV before needing admission to ITU was 3 days. Some biochemical markers which stood out in relation to the outcomes described were as follows: average LDH, D-dimer and Troponin levels were higher in those who were admitted to intensive care. In patients who died, the PCT was significantly higher on average when compared to the other two groups. In the group who were discharged, mean lymphocyte count was >1, in the other two groups this was <1. From our observations in Portsmouth, there is a negative correlation between deprivation and lower aged individuals admitted for COVID-19 related respiratory support. Overall, we also saw disproportionate representation of those from the most deprived 50% of the UK in our respiratory support unit. Conclusion(s): CPAP and NIV can effectively be used in an RSU during a spike of COVID-19, to safely minimise demand on critical care services. Deprivation may have an impact on outcomes in patients needing respiratory support related to COVID-19. Deprivation levels may help predict risk of needing enhanced respiratory support in certain age groups. Multiple biochemical markers may be of prognostic value in COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Obesity is a condition prone to pose difficulties to a successful extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Not being a contraindication, it yields significant challenges to physicians and may interfere with patient;s outcome. The number of obese patients supported by ECMO has increased during COVID-19 pandemic due to severe illness in this population. We designed a retrospective study in order to identify prognostic factors for 180-day survival in critical COVID-19 obese patients in venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO). Method(s): Single-center retrospective cohort of critical COVID-19 adult patients in VV-ECMO, obese and overweight (according to WHO classification), admitted in a tertiary hospital;s ICU from April 1st 2020 to May 31th2022. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess 180-day mortality differences. Result(s): The analysis included 41 patients. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] age was 55 (IQR 45-60) years and 70,7% were male. Median body mass index (BMI) was 36 (IQR 31-42,5) Kg/m2 ;39% of patients had a BMI >=40 kg/m2 . The sampling had 3 (IQR 1,5-4) days of invasive ventilation prior to ECMO and 63,4% were weaned from ECMO-VV support after a median of 19 (IQR 10-34) days. The median ICU length of stay was 31,9 (IQR 17,5-44,5) days. The invasive ventilation period was 30 (IQR 19-49,5) days. The 60, 90 and 180-day mortalities were 41,5%. On the univariate logistic regression analysis we found that higher BMI was associated with higher 180-day survival (odds ratio [OR] 1,157 (1,038-1,291), p 0,009). Younger age, female patients, less invasive ventilation time prior to ECMO and fewer complications at time of ECMO cannulation were associated with higher 180-day survival [respectively, OR 0,858 (0,774- 0,953), p 0,004;OR 0,074 (0,008-0,650), p 0,019;OR 0,612 (0,401-0,933), p 0.022;OR 0.13 (0,03-0,740), p 0,022)]. Conclusion(s): In this retrospective cohort of critical COVID-19 obese adult patients supported by VVECMO, a higher BMI, younger age and female patients were associated with higher 180-day survival. A shorter invasive ventilation time prior to ECMO and fewer complications at ECMO cannulation were also associated with increased survival.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Northern Ireland (NI) has 5.5 ICU beds/100 000 population,1 amongst the lowest in Western Europe.2 Alongside ICU bed expansion the Covid-19 response required delivery of advanced Respiratory support (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO)) outside ICU. ICNARC provides robust data for patients within ICU but this is unavailable for those receiving 'critical care' elsewhere. Objective(s): To evaluate delivery of CPAP/HFNO outside of ICU to Covid-19 patients - focusing on demographics and outcomes including ICU admission and mortality. Method(s): Ward-CPAP for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF) was not previously utilised.3 It was introduced for Covid-19 to Medical wards. Data was analysed using the NI Electronic Care Record, ward electronic note system (EDAMS) and ICU system (ICCA, Koninklijke Philips N.V.). Data was compared between Wave 1 (01/03/2020 - 12/12/2020) and Wave 2 (13/12/2020 - 01/04/2021). Result(s): 215 patients received CPAP/HFNO/Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV) for Covid-19: 103 in Wave 1 and 112 in Wave 2. 75 Covid-19 patients were admitted to the ICU itself (comprising 44 of the study cohort, 11 direct from ED and 20 transferred from other Trusts). Table 1 shows demographics. Fewer patients were female as seen elsewhere,4 there were more young patients in Wave 2. The majority of patients would likely have been ICU candidates pre-pandemic,3 but a subset of 25% were deemed for a ward ceiling-of-care on admission by a Consultant and the proportion of elderly patients was higher than described by ICNARC.4 Comorbidities and obesity were common. Outcomes are shown in Table 2 and Figures 1-3. Close co-operation with ICU saw 61% of patients with a documented ICU review. Overall 20% of patients were admitted to ICU, and 15% received IMV. Mortality was 37%, but 22% if patients with an admission ward ceiling-of-care decision were excluded. Mortality correlated with frailty and age (fig 2&3). Outcomes were generally better in Wave 2. Conclusion(s): This Evaluation documents the huge contribution to the critical care Covid-19 response made by our Medical teams, not captured by ICNARC. Most patients avoided ICU admission and IMV and outcomes were likely at least comparable which undoubtedly freed up vital ICU beds. We thank the teams involved and believe it is vital to evaluate the outcome of all critically ill Covid-19 patients irrespective of their location.
ABSTRACT
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) via a mask to maintain a constant positive airway pressure (CPAP mask) is the method of choice for the treatment of pulmonary disorders in severe COVID-19-associated pneumonia. Nowadays, there are no studies which had shown the effectiveness of the ROX-index in predicting the efficacy of NIV in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF). This clinical case describes our experience of effective use of ROX-index in patients with AHRF because of coronavirus dis-ease, SARS-CoV-2-associated, who underwent non-invasive lung ventilation through CPAP mask. © 2022. The Authors.
ABSTRACT
Background: The recognition of the relationship between thromboembolism in COVID-19 and poor clinical outcomes led to the use of anticoagulants in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Aim(s): To determine the effects of anticoagulants in COVID-19 patients and to compare the effect of oral, subcutaneous, and combined anticoagulants on patient outcomes. Study design: Retrospective cohort study Place and duration: A private tertiary care hospital, in Lahore, from 1st April 2020 to 30 Sep 2020 Methodology: Data were collected from electronic and paper records of admitted patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 on PCR or with a radiological diagnosis of COVID-19. A total of 179 patients were included in the study, 172 were given anticoagulation, out of these, 74 were given oral anticoagulation, 73 were given subcutaneous and 24 were given combination of oral and subcutaneous anticoagulants. Result(s): Among 172 patients on anticoagulants, 41(23.8%) expired while 131(76.2%) recovered. Among 7(100%) patients on no anticoagulation, 1(14.3%) patient expired while 6(85.7%) recovered. 19(11%) patients on anticoagulation progressed towards the need for invasive ventilation while 152(89%) patients did not need invasive ventilation. Among patients on subcutaneous anticoagulants, 27(37%) expired while 46(63%) recovered. 8(33.3%) patients on combined anticoagulants expired while 16(66.7%) recovered. 6(8.1%) patients on oral anticoagulants expired while 68(91.9%) recovered. Conclusion(s): Anticoagulation improves the outcome of COVID-19 patients and oral anticoagulation is better than subcutaneous and combined anticoagulation.Copyright © 2023 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Assessment of the literature on the ProtekDuo cannula when used as venopulmonary (V-P) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in ARDS secondary to COVID-19. Method(s): Systematic literature search in EMBASE, Medline (Pubmed) and NHS library using appropriate keywords as well as PICOS and PRISMA approach. Result(s): We found 285 publications, of which 5 publications met the search criteria and were included in this review. A total of 194 patients with COVID-19 related ARDS had a ProtekDuo placed to establish venovenous (V-V) ECMO and right ventricular (RV) support. Patients treated with the ProtekDuo cannula had survival rates between between the studies of 59 and 89%, with a significant survival compared to an invasive ventilation group or when compared to dual site V-V ECMO or other double lumen ECMO cannulas. One of the studies focused on extubation and early discontinuation of ventilator support, which the authors achieved in 100% of ProtekDuo patients. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was significantly reduced in the ProtekDuo versus other groups. Conclusion(s): The ProtekDuo displayed lower mortality rates, AKI occurrence and CRRT need as compared to other respiratory support modalities and has shown to be a game changer for ECMO support in patients suffering from COVID-19 ARDS. Many authors suggested the ProtekDuo for first line use in these patients.
ABSTRACT
The SARS-coronavirus 2 disease initially reported in December 2019 in China (COVID-19) represents a major challenge for intensive care medicine, due to the high number of ICU admission and the prolonged stay for many patients. Up to 5% of COVID-19 infected patients develop severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation as supportive treatment. Apart from early antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatment, the management of COVID-19 patients is mainly applying protective mechanical ventilation, to support the injured lungs. However recently acquired data and clinical experience suggest that COVID-19-related ARDS presents some specificities that will be summarized in the present article.Copyright © 2020 Editions Medecine et Hygiene. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Acute respiratory tract infections are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children. Although human bocavirus (HBoV) infections are not as common as other seasonal respiratory viruses, children who are infected with HBoV are more likely to suffer from a variety of respiratory conditions, including the common cold, acute otitis media, asthma exacerbations, bronchiolitis pneumonia, some of the affected children require pediatric intensive care unit stay. Here, we aimed to evaluate pediatric bocavirus (HBoV) cases presenting with severe respiratory tract symptoms during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Method(s): This retrospective study evaluated the medical records of children diagnosed with respiratory infections, followed up at the Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangazi University between September 2021 and March 2022. In this study, patients with HBoV identified using nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were considered positive. Cases were analyzed retrospectively for their clinical characteristics. Result(s): This study included 54 children (29 girls and 25 boys) with HBoV in nasopharyngeal PCR samples. The cases ranged in age from 1 month to 72 months (median 25 months). At the time of presentation, cough, fever, and respiratory distress were the most prevalent symptoms. Hyperinflation (48%), pneumonic consolidation (42%), and pneumothorax-pneumomediastinum (7%) were observed on the chest X-ray;54% of the children required intensive care unit stay. The median length of hospitalization was 6 days. Bacterial coinfection was detected in 7 (17%) children, while HBoV and other viruses were present in 20 (37%) children;57% of children received supplemental oxygen by mask, 24% high-flow nasal oxygen, 7% continuous positive airway pressure, and 9% invasive mechanical ventilation support. Antibiotics were given to 34 (63%) cases, and systemic steroid treatment was given to 41 (76%) cases. Chest tubes were inserted in three out of the four cases with pneumothorax-pneumomediastinum. All patients were recovered and were discharged from the hospital. Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 pandemic changed the epidemiology of seasonal respiratory viruses and the clinical course of the diseases. Although it usually causes mild symptoms, severe respiratory symptoms can lead to life-threatening illnesses requiring intensive care admission.Copyright © 2023. The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a pharmacist-managed protocol for transitioning critically ill patients from intravenous (iv) to subcutaneous insulin compared with a provider-managed process. Method(s): This single-center, retrospective, observational study included patients admitted to the medical or surgical/trauma intensive care unit who received a continuous infusion of iv insulin from January 2019 to April 2021. Patients were excluded if they were less than 18 years of age, pregnant, incarcerated, or received iv insulin for the diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state, calcium channel blocker or beta blocker overdose, or hypertriglyceridemia. The primary outcome was the percentage of blood glucose (BG) concentrations within the target range of 70-150 mg/dL from 0 to 48 h following transition to subcutaneous insulin. Secondary outcomes included percentage of BG concentrations within goal range following transition at 0-12 h and 12-24 h, incidence of hypo- and hyperglycemia, and percentage of patients requiring dose adjustments after initial transition. Result(s): A total of 110 unique patients were included with 70 patients in the provider-managed group and 40 patients in the pharmacist-managed group. On average, pharmacists transitioned patients to 63% basal insulin based on their 24-h total day dose of insulin. The pharmacist-managed group achieved glycemic control in 53% of transitions at 12 h, 40% at 24 h, and 47% from 0 to 48 h, while the provider group achieved glycemic control in 25% of transitions at 12 h, 12% at 24 h, and 18% from 0 to 48 h (p < 0.001 for all time points). As for safety end points, the pharmacist-managed group demonstrated lower rates of hypoglycemia (p = 0.001), severe hypoglycemia (p = 0.332), hyperglycemia (p < 0.001), and severe hyperglycemia (p < 0.001) compared with the provider-managed group. Conclusion(s): Pharmacists can effectively and safely transition critically ill patients from iv to subcutaneous insulin utilizing a standardized protocol.Copyright © 2023 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Death from SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia resulted from progressive respiratory failure in most patients. Whenever accessible, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VVECMO) was implemented to rescue patients with refractory hypoxemia. Reported mortality in this population reached values from 20 to 50 percent, but the direct causes of death were not so widely acknowledged. The aim of our study was to characterize mortality in patients treated with VVECMO support. Method(s): Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database in an ECMO referral centre. All patients with diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with VVECMO support were included. Survivors and nonsurvivors were compared using t-student and chi2 methods. A Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of mortality at admission. Result(s): Ninety-three patients were included (29% female). Median age was 54+/-12 years, mean SOFA was 5.7+/-2.9 and SAPS II was 35.6+/-13.6. Hospital mortality was 24.7%. Main causes of death were septic shock in 39.1% (9 patients), irreversible lung fibrosis 30.4% (7 patients) and catastrophic hemorrhage in 4.3% (4 patients). End-of-life care measures (withdrawal or withholding) were adopted in 65.2% of non-survivals. Patients who died were older (55 vs 48 years, p<0.05), had longer disease course (19 vs 15.3 days, p<0.05), longer invasive mechanical ventilation course before cannulation (8.5 vs 5 days, p<0.05), lower static lung compliance (25.5 vs 31.8 mL/cmH2O, p<0.05) and were ventilated with lower PEEP (8 vs 10 cmH2O, p<0.05) on cannulation. On a Cox-regression model, only prone ventilation before cannulation (HR 9,7;CI 95% 1,4- 68,6;p<0.05) and SAPS II (HR 1.04;CI 95% 1,001- 1,083;p<0.05) predicted mortality. Conclusion(s): Mortality in patients with severe SARSCoV-2 pneumonia treated with VVECMO was exceedingly low in our study, when compared with other series. Only one-third died from progressive lung disease, which suggests that protocol improvement can further reduce mortality.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The objetive of this study is to describe the cases trasferred to an ECMO referral;s centre (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid (Spain)), to investigate characteristics before ECMO and while the patient was on ECMO, to analyse the presence or not of complications secondary to transfer and cannulation and finally to analyse the ICU outcome. Method(s): This is a Prospective study done from November 1st, 2020 to December 31st, 2022. The cases were accepted either for emergency ECMO cannulation in the hospital of origin and retrieval or for conventional transfer. We analysed basic decriptive variables such as male proportion, age, IMC and etiology of ARDS and variables before ECMO such as prone position, duration of non-invasive ventilation, invasive ventilation and ICU leght of stay before ECMO. We recorded ELSO, SOFA and APACHE Severity Scores. We also analysed several variables on ECMO: if prone position on ECMO was done, median days of ECMO and succesfull weaning from ECMO. We also recorded whether there were complications or not in the transfer and cannulation. Finally ICU survival was examined. Result(s): 31 cases were accepted. 22 (71 %) were male. 29 cases were accepted for emergency ECMO cannulation. Median age was 47 years and IMC 31.1. The etiology of SDRA was COVID 19 infection in 23 cases (74% cases). Lenght of non invasive and invasive ventilation before ECMO were 4 days and 3 days respectively and lenght of ICU admission before ECMO was 2 days. Prone position was 1 day and 2 prone sessions were done before ECMO. Severity scores: APACHE 10 , SOFA 4 , ELSO 3 . On ECMO Prone position was done on 15 cases(48.4%) . Median days on ECMO were 13.5 days. Succesfull weaning from ECMO were achieved on 20 cases(61%), 2 cases remain on ECMO. No complications were seen on transfer or cannulation. ICU Survivors were 16(51.6%). Conclusion(s): After 2 years of experience on ECMO retrieval in the region of Madrid ECMO availability was achieved. Our results are similar than ELSO mortality.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Airway hemorrhage (AH) frequently complicates extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatment. Inflammation, coagulopathy and antithrombotic therapy are contributing factors. Patients with COVID-19- associated ARDS (CARDS) supported with ECMO present all these features. We aim to characterize the incidence and the clinical and prognostic impact of AH. Method(s): Review of a cohort of patients with CARDS treated with ECMO support at a single ECMO centre between March 2020-February 2022 (n=92). AH was defined as a clinically significant hemorrhage fit demanded interruption of anticoagulation, transfusional support or bronchoscopy. Univariate analysis was performed using GraphPadPrism. Result(s): One third (n= 31) of patients with CARDS treated with ECMO had clinically significant AH. Patients who developed AH had significantly longer ICU length-of-stay (LoS), ECMO run and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) duration. Significant differences in coagulation and inflammatory markers were detected between patients with early (<72h) versus late (>9 days) onset of AH (Table 1). Mortality at day 90, demographics, comorbidities, CT scan pattern and clinical severity indexes were similar between patients with and without AH (NAH). Conclusion(s): In patients with severe CARDS treated with ECMO support, the occurrence of airway hemorrhage leads to clinically important morbidity but does not increase mortality. Distinct pathways may be involved in the development of early v. late AH. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: It is well documented that survivors of ICU admissions struggle to return to pre-admission level of function because of both physical and psychological burden. Current guidance therefore recommends a follow-up service to review patients 2-3 months post discharge from ICU [NICE 2009]. Prior to 2020 University Hospitals Bristol and Weston (UHBW) had no such service. With the increase in patient numbers seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, funding was received to provide a follow-up clinic to COVID-19 survivors. Spare clinic spaces were used for non COVID ICU patients. Objective(s): To review symptoms reported by patients in the following 3 groups, COVID-19 patients treated in ICU (COVID ICU), COVID-19 patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in high dependency areas (COVID CPAP) and non COVID-19 ICU patients (ICU), at 2-3 months post discharge from UHBW. Method(s): Referred patients had an initial phone call at 8 weeks post discharge. The call identified both physical and psychological symptoms. Advice regarding recovery, signposting to resources and onwards referrals to appropriate specialities were provided. If symptoms indicated, patients would then be referred into the multidisciplinary team follow up clinic. Here they met with an intensivist, clinical psychologist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, speech and language therapist and dietitian. Result(s): As Graph 1 shows all 3 patient groups had a wide variety of ongoing symptoms at 2-3 months post discharge. Fatigue was the most common symptom reported in all 3 groups. Breathlessness was the second most common symptom reported by COVID patients but was less frequently reported in the ICU population who had a variety of non-respiratory related reasons for admission. COVID ICU patients more commonly reported ongoing problems with their swallowing, voice and communication compared to the COVID CPAP group, most probably due to invasive ventilation. Psychological burden post critical illness was high in all 3 groups. More than 20% of all patients scored =10 on a PHQ-9 depression scale showing moderate to severe depression. More than 15% of all patients scored =10 on a GAD-7 showing moderately severe to severe anxiety. COVID ICU group had the highest incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This may be linked to the higher level of delirium we saw in this group, as a result of change in practice, such as full PPE and absence of visiting during the pandemic. ICU patients presented with a significantly higher percentage of physiotherapy needs. This is likely because patients with the longest and most complex ICU admissions were selected for the clinic. Sleep likely goes under reported in these results as we only began questioning specifically about this later on in the clinic. Conclusion(s): This data goes some way in supporting current literature that the rehabilitation needs of COVID ICU patients equal that of ICU patients (Puthucheary et al 2021). It also shows the need to follow up patients who receive advanced respiratory support outside of the ICU environment, as their symptoms, and therefore rehabilitation needs are very similar to ICU patients at 2-3 months post discharge.
ABSTRACT
Up to 70% of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 need respiratory support, up to 10% need high-flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive and invasive ventilation. However, standard methods of respiratory support are ineffective in 0.4-0.5% of patients. In case of potentially reversible critical refractory respiratory failure that patients may require ECMO. Management of patients with extremely severe COVID-19 associates with numerous clinical challenges, including critical illness, multiple organ dysfunction, blood coagulation disorders, requiring prolonged ICU stay and care, use of multiple pharmacotherapies including immunosuppressive drugs. Pharmacological suppression of immunity is associated with a significant increase in the risk of secondary bacterial and fungal infections. Currently, data on epidemiology of secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 undergoing ECMO is limited. Aim. To study the prevalence and etiology of secondary infections associated with positive blood cultures in patients with extremely severe COVID-19 requiring ECMO. Materials and methods. A single-center retrospective non-interventional epidemiological study including 125 patients with extremely severe COVID-19 treated with ECMO in April 2020 to December 2021. Results. Out of 700 blood culture tests performed in 125 patients during the study, 250 tests were positive confirming bacteremia/fungemia. Isolated pathogens varied depending on the duration of ECMO: gram-positive bacteria (primarily coagulase-negative staphylococci) dominated from the initiation of ECMO support;increased duration of ECMO associated with an increasing the proportion of pathogens common in ICU (Klebsiella pneumoniae and/or Acinetobacter baumannii with extensively drug resistant and pan-drug resistant phenotypes, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium). When ECMO lasted more than 7-14 days, opportunistic pathogens (Candida species, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Providencia stuartii, non-diphtheria corynebacteria, Burkholderia species and others) prevailed as etiological agents. Conclusion. Longer duration of ECMO resulted in increasing the rates of infectious complications. In patients undergoing ECMO for more than 14 days, the microbiological landscape becomes extremely diverse, which hampers choosing an empirical antimicrobial therapy. Since potential pathogens causing secondary infections in patients during ECMO are difficult to predict, rapid identification of rare opportunistic pathogens and their sensitivity profile, followed by targeted administration of antimicrobials, seems most beneficial.Copyright © 2023, V.A. Negovsky Research Institute of General Reanimatology. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: The role of inflammatory cytokines is known in the pathogenesis of organ damage and is also confirmed in the context of COVID-19 disease. The modulation of the cytokine storm seems to determine endothelial protection, which can translate into a reduction of the "capillary leak syndrome", and, consequently, in a better control of the formation of edema and pulmonary infiltrates. CytoSorb stands in this context as a cartridge capable of adsorbing cytokines and allowing a better clinical course. Case Report: A 69 years-old woman with a history of arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and CKD, was admitted to ICU for SARS Cov 2 related critical illness staged with chest CT, blood gas analysis and PCR. At the admission, the patient presented with ubiquitous interstitial pneumonia, PaO2 60 mmHg with 90% Airvo2 and PCR 36.67. Therefore, in order to remove inflammatory cytokines, the patient underwent hemoperfusion treatment with the CytoSorb adsorbent cartridge. Method(s): The protocol used is approved by the FDA for the treatment of covid patients and consists of the use of 4 cartridges 12h, 12h, 24h, 24h with measurement for each cycle of PCR, PaO2 and chest CT control. Result(s): During the hemoperfusion whit CytoSorb, respiratory failure improved until the patient was discharged from the ICU on the tenth day, with oxygen support via simple facial mask. Below the progressive values of the PCR, PaO2 and the chest CT control on the twelfth day. Conclusion(s): The hemoperfusion treatment with the CytoSorb adsorbent cartridge proved to be a valid adjuvant therapy in determining a better clinical course both in terms of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and survival.
ABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) became crucial in treating patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Despite the fear of viral aerosolization, non-invasive respiratory support has gained attention as a way to alleviate ICU overcrowding and reduce the risks associated with intubation. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented increased demand for research, resulting in numerous publications on observational studies, clinical trials, reviews, and meta-analyses in the past three years. This comprehensive narrative overview describes the physiological rationale, pre-COVID-19 evidence, and results of observational studies and randomized control trials regarding the use of high-flow nasal oxygen, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, and continuous positive airway pressure in adult patients with COVID-19 and associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The review also highlights the significance of guidelines and recommendations provided by international societies and the need for further well-designed research to determine the optimal use of NIRS in treating this population.